Cleverly Campaigning On Foreign Soil?
Is Mr. Bush doing neocon campaigning on foreign soil? And why is Mr. Bush using the word “appeasement“? And why is Mr. Bush talking about Adolph Hitler? Adolph Hitler’s visit to Poland was much like the Bush team’s visit to Iraq.
Trying to appease the neocons out of their Iraqi adventure was no more effective than trying to appease Adolph Hitler’s aggression. The neocons attempt to sanitize their aggression by renaming it “pre-emptive self-defense” was a joke.
Nobody stopped, via appeasement, Adolph Hitler’s aggression against Poland and nobody stopped via appeasement, the Bush team’s aggression toward Iraq.
For those who tried to “appease” the neocons - they got ignored after being called “fascist sympathizers“. Nobody “appeased” the neocons out of their Iraq war. The neocons, like Adolph Hitler was not going to loose sight of an important objective - the Iraq war. Even if appeasers tried “mightily” to appease the neocons - they were destined to fail. Like Adolph Hitler, the neocons were determined.
Tyler Drumheller, a 26 year member of the CIA told Ed Bradley of 60 Minutes:
“The idea of going after Iraq was U.S. policy. It was going to happen one way or the other,” says Drumheller.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/04/21/60minutes/main1527749.shtml
Adolph Hitler’s aggression should have been stopped - not appeased. Neocon’s aggression should have been what?
<<< Missing Back Button >>>
<<< Back Button Returned - It’s a professional nusiance >>>
<<< Back Button Missing >>>
<<< Back Button Returned >>>
Tags: neocons, Bush, 60 Minutes, adolph hitler, aggression, appease, CIA, ed bradley, foreign soil, tyler drumheller
