An abc News article by SIMON MCGREGOR-WOOD questions a possible policy shift between Israel and its closest ally – America. The full article can be read at:
http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=7694664&page=1
The neocons were busy in the Middle East just as they were busy in America, Iraq and Afghanistan. And, by and large, the problems that got the focus of the neocons rarely got better with their solution/s. Iraq could fit in this category.
What category does Israel fit into? Could the category be Peace? Could the category be war? Could the category be other? Is there really a need to revisit the OLD Middle East policy?
Israel recently told America to “do something about Iran or it would”. Was this command a product of the OLD policy? If so, the old policy needs looking at. Perhaps, a change from the old policy to a new policy is needed.
Under the OLD policy Israel decided to attack a facility in Syria. It seems the Syrians were building or thought to be building something that the Zionist State did not like. The Zionist State likely used approved weapons(non-Iranian) to put the Syrian targets out of commission. And, apparently – under the OLD policy the UN did not do much of anything.
There is a small “gated community” in the Middle East. It is a “container” for many Palestinians who used to have a home in their native land of Palestine. Not only did the Palestinians loose their native home to the Zionist State – they are forbidden to have a new state named Palestine.
And when the Palestinian’s testosterone driven urges prompted them to fire “low tech” rockets at sparsely settled land in Israel, high tech F16’s(non-Iranian made) responded.
The Middle East is, and has been a problem for a long time. Ex-President Nixon showed concern – Ex-President George W. Bush’s administration appeared to wear Middle East bias on shirt-sleeves. That bias, so blatant during the rein of the latter-day neocons, should be removed – if a Middle East solution other than genocide is desired.
The Middle East is in dire need of a policy shift if genocide is not the FINAL SOLUTION. The old policy has not worked for anyone but the Zionist State. The old policy made “neo-con driven America” look like an accomplice to activities that are un-American.
Under the OLD POLICY, Hamas won a democratically held West Bank election. But, for some reason, that election appeared to have been nullified or rolled back or something. Neither the Bush team nor the Zionist State made a fuss over the DEMOCRATICALLY held election that for some reason “did not take”. The citizens voted, but the election “did not take”.
The OLD POLICY saw a very turbulent Middle East with most of the “downside” falling on Hamas. Hamas lost Palestine to Jewish terrorists who sorta faded into politics. Hamas’s chance at politics in the West Bank failed – for some reason.
And do not, for one moment, believe that the Arab world was not aware of the bias of the OLD POLICY. But the latter-day neocons made that bias blatant. It is time to revisit the OLD POLICY. Stop the genocide.
