Joejolly read two news articles on BBC News website. Both were about the Republicans focus for 2012. National security rather than national economy “won the toss”. National security and national economy are both very, very important to the well-being of a country. America’s economy should have been the focus but we all know why the neocons avoids that topic.
Those republicans must have had one-hell of a problem figuring out which topic to select. The republicans, after twenty-some-odd years at America’s helm have plenty to talk about. They played big roles in America’s security and economy. Wonder how the neocons decided which topic to choose? They have way-less exposure in security than in the economy. Perhaps thats why the neocons decided to select the topic that they did not totally crash. They selected security.
Security won out. And at home, the neocons may want to bring back their color-coded security alerts. The color-coded security alerts were designed to stay on the minds of America – from the breakfast table to the dinner table. However - when neocon politics hits a low bump, the color-code could compensate by being raised a notch..
Wars are costly affairs but America’s security from aggressor nations means America must keep those aggressor nations at bay.
Before there was a “lick” of evidence against Iraq, the neocons went on the prowl for evidence of a Niger-Iraq weapons of mass destruction connection. Someone, on the supply-side of the “evidence market” came up with exactly the document that the demand-side needed. On the demand side, if you have deep pockets and you alert a market to your need, that need will likely be filled.
The document that surfaced, to fill the neocons need, was said to have made an international trip from Africa via Italy and into the hands of the British and the mouth of America’s neocon president. The neocon President, in 2003, described in 16 words, the threat facing America. Congress was fooled, but it was only the first time. So the shame did not rest on Congress.
Since the neocons were faced with an aggressor nation(Iraq) the neocons had to attack the aggressor nation before that aggressor nation attacked the neocons … understand?. The neocons termed their action, “PRE-EMPTIVE SELF DEFENSE”. The United Nations knew what it was and did not play a leadership role as it did in the Gulf War. The United Nations’ IAEA finally got it hands on that document that was so persuasive for the mentality/ideology of the neocons. Seymour Hersh, in his New Yorker Magazine article, described the IAEA’s reaction to the document that the neocons “used as gospel”. And a description of that document may have played a role in how difficult it was for the United Nations IAEA to get its hands on that document.
The neocons, by whatever name the press and the neocons care to call them, have a long string of failures “under their belt”. And the neocons seems to be attracted to the “underbelly” of human relationships. Linking human beings to a source of the illegal drug crack cocaine ought not be in the minds of Christians. But racism has helped the neocon political headcount.
For the Jews one of the neocons says he’ll go to Israel first. Israel is a foreign country. Los Angeles, California is not. It was crack cocaine for Los Angeles but something quite different for the foreign country of Israel. The neocons would not likely sell crack cocaine to Israel. Crack cocaine is a destructive recreational drug.
It’s the economy stupid!!!
The neocons don’t want to talk about the economy because they wrecked it in 2007. They could not have wrecked it in 2007 had they not prepared for it earlier. They prepared, in 1999, for the economy crash of 2007. In 1999 neocons removed banking restrictions that had protected America’s economy for seventy-some-odd years. But, for some reason, they left intact government protection of America’s personal bank accounts. Smart people – huh?
So, the neocons are focusing on national security. Wonder who they’ll cast as WORLD POLICEMAN? Wonder how much that’ll cost America. Will the United Nations vote the neocons the legal right to act on its behalf? Will the neocons continue to urge terrorists to “bring’em on”? Will Iraq’s oil well’s require world police monitoring?
Joejolly wonders when the neocons will boast of what they have done. It looks like you can’t make a neocon talk about what they have contributed to America. And that is because BIG OIL, BIG BANKS, BIG GAS and BIG PHARMACEUTICALS would likely want to stay mum.