It is no secret that America’s neocons have placed major emphasis in war and capitalism tools. And their use of both tools have more of a basis in neocon political ideology than Americana. With respect to wars, Americana(pre-neocon) said, “speak/walk softly and carry a big stick”. Neocon political ideology on war caused one world leader to describe America as a bully. And that description was being kind because now we see this: Foreigners See U.S. As ‘Greedy Bully‘.
When the neocons didn’t have a war of their own, they adopted one. They picked the jungles of South America as their first venture into war. When America’s ombudsmen(voters) decided to stop financing that Reagan adopted war, crack cocaine – sold in minority neighborhoods of Los Angeles, California(Reagan country), replaced those lost tax funds.
Adolf Hitler’s war-making exceeded the neocons’ war-making in scope. Adolf Hitler went after more countries than did America’s neocons who only went after Iraq. But in the justification area – both Adolf Hitler and America’s neocons shared the same standing. And with respect to the legality of the neocon’s Iraq war, the United Nations, with headquarters in America’s New York City, quietly said the Iraq war was illegal.
War and capitalism are two tools that are quite capable of subjugating the world – certainly much of the Western world. And that is in evidence. Wars cost money and lives. Capitalism can wreck or enhance money and lives – depending on whether or not capitalism is managed by controlled greed(ambition) or UN-controlled greed.
Any tool, in the wrong hands, can be a weapon. The war tool and the capitalism tool have done grave damage to America and indeed the Western world.
[ The crack cocaine link, WWW.JUSTICE.GOV/OIG/SPECIAL/97 takes a look at the cocaine plague that enveloped that minority neighborhood of Los Angeles, California]
Like this:
Tags: bully, capitalism, crack cocaine, grave damage, greedy bully, neocons, powerful tools, reagan, reshaping world, War
November 30, 2011 at 4:21 pm |
You have been blogging since 2007? How do you not have a massive following? I’ve really enjoyed what I have read so far.
I don’t know if you can call it a neo-con movement anymore as it seems like the dems and republicans are in this thing together now days. There are only a few politicians that seem really concerned with the issues (Ron and Rand Paul for example)
They should just combine the two parties and call it Neo-Capitalists or something.
November 30, 2011 at 6:28 pm |
Neither Ron nor Rand Paul would dare touch the issues that are crippling America and indeed the world. And the reason is most of the world’s problems are the result of the performance of the party of the two.
You can’t make neocons talk about their political performance although they have had twenty-some-odd years in which to perform. And the name change does not relieve them of some responsibility in what their party has “achieved”.
America was and still is in deep weeds. It was in deep weeds when Joejolly was appalled at America’s behavior in 2007. And when you tell joejolly that the intellect which allowed the necons to again “let loose” banks in 1999 to return to 1929 behavior it should come as no surprise at the following of joejolly’s readers. Even the followers of Jesus Christ seem to be “at large’.