Thanks for your response Bill Hurtz.
In Bill Hurtz’s response he said: “This is as misleading as Hell”. Joejolly intended to continue reading but that’s all the writing there was. Consequently, joejolly could not continue reading. Bill Hurtz’s response started and ended with “This is as misleading as Hell”.
Joejolly has gotten responses like “lol” and other rebuttals but rarely does joejolly remember getting direct rebuttals focused on joejolly’s comments. Actually, joejolly can only recall one. And that one had to do with “Weapons of Mass Destruction”. While joejolly said “no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq” – a responder said “weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq”. And the responder pointed joejolly to an article in the Washington Times that did indeed support his rebuttal.
The Washington Times was in the chemical category and joejolly and many others were in the nuclear category.
So, with the current responder, joejolly has been told that his topic is “misleading as hell” but giving no indication as to how Bill Hurtz arrived at his conclusion or what steps joejolly can take to improve his post.
Never-the-less joejolly thanks Bill Hurtz for responding to his “When Did Fracking Get Started” post.
Tags: bill hurst, fracking, misleading as hell, responded to joejolly's post
