The Neocons Have Little Respect For Other Peoples’ Privacy – National Or International



Europeans Voice Anger Over Reports of Spying by U.S. on its Allies

The Dangers of Surveillance

Neil M. Richards

Washington University in Saint Louis – School of Law
March 25, 2013
Harvard Law Review, 2013

From the Fourth Amendment to George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, our culture is full of warnings about state scrutiny of our lives. These warnings are commonplace, but they are rarely very specific. Other than the vague threat of an Orwellian dystopia, as a society we don’t really know why surveillance is bad, and why we should be wary of it. To the extent the answer has something to do with “privacy,” we lack an understanding of what “privacy” means in this context, and why it matters. Developments in government and corporate practices have made this problem more urgent. Although we have laws that protect us against government surveillance, secret government programs cannot be challenged until they are discovered. And even when they are, courts frequently dismiss challenges to such programs for lack of standing, under the theory that mere surveillance creates no tangible harms, as the Supreme Court did recently in the case of Clapper v. Amnesty International. We need a better account of the dangers of surveillance.

This article offers such an account.[…]

[…] First, we must recognize that surveillance transcends the public-private divide. Even if we are ultimately more concerned with government surveillance, any solution must grapple with the complex relationships between government and corporate watchers. Second, we must recognize that secret surveillance is illegitimate, and prohibit the creation of any domestic surveillance programs whose existence is secret. […]

Court ruling that NSA spying violated 4th Amendment remains secret: Ars Technica

NSA has massive database of Americans’ phone calls

NSA Spying on Americans

PRISM helped stop terrorism in US and 20-plus countries, NSA document argues

This neocon attack on world privacy shows how woefully inadequate the neocons’ skills really are. How you do – what you do – can be as important as what you do. Accomplishments achieved – via violations of law or un-ethical means are tainted accomplishments.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s